In the corporate landscape, there are instances of misconduct that fly under the radar , and then there are stories that challenge the core of professional ethics . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , epitomizes such a situation—a saga of alleged misconduct that not only taints the reputation of a lone supervisor but throws doubt over the enterprise’s integrity.
Despite serious allegations , Collins has remained in his role , appearing untouched by the controversies surrounding him . How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? Based on insider information , Collins’ history of improper behavior started with violations of the organization’s employment terms , but it didn’t end there . Instead, it evolved into a series of ethical breaches that has left fellow employees demoralized and stakeholders confused .
While attending a professional growth course — supposedly designed to boost managerial skills —David Collins allegedly morphed what should have been a professional opportunity into a sequence of unprofessional occurrences. Sources claim he spent company-sponsored junkets seeking inappropriate relations, a blatant disregard of Ventia’s business principles , all while his household stayed oblivious .
But the indiscretions didn’t stop at personal entanglements . One of the more shocking revelations involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to share suggestive pictures to women—a significant exploitation of professional tools and a breakdown of professionalism . His bold misuse of Microsoft Teams to send suggestive messages —including symbols celebrating indiscretions—paints a picture of a man unconcerned with the consequences . Following these digital flirtations , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on repeated times during working hours, despite his own marital status and her having a partner . This blatant misuse of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but Ventia New Zealand destroyed families — leaving a path of mistrust that extended outside of the organizational context.
What reason can this behavior be allowed to persist ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly overstepped every rule is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, stems from a problematic dearth of accountability within the business. Grievances have been filed , yet Collins persists Ventia Expose unabated.
This shortage of repercussions sets a perilous example: that title and position within the firm can shield someone from repercussions . It promotes a hostile office atmosphere , demoralizes employees , and ultimately damages the firm’s reputation .