In the business world , there are instances of misconduct that fly under the radar , and then there are stories that put a spotlight on moral failures. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that not only taints the reputation of a specific individual but throws doubt over the enterprise’s integrity.
Despite serious allegations , Collins has held onto his title , visibly unaffected by the furor engulfing him. How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the firm’s focus on transparency ? According to sources , Collins’ history of improper behavior was marked by infractions of the organization’s employment terms , but it didn’t end there . Instead, it evolved into a series of ethical breaches that has left fellow employees demoralized and partners bewildered .
During a leadership training program — supposedly designed to boost managerial skills —David Collins allegedly transformed what should have been a development chance into a series of reckless events . It’s reported he spent corporate-sponsored travels attempting to seduce female colleagues , a glaring violation of Ventia’s corporate ethics , all while his home life was kept in the dark.
But the impropriety didn’t conclude with these encounters . One of the more shocking revelations involves his alleged exploitation of company IT systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a clear misuse of professional tools and a breach of trust . His reckless employment of Microsoft Teams to distribute risqué communications—including emoticons signaling illicit encounters — reveals a character of a man heedless of the repercussions . Following these digital dalliances, Collins allegedly progressed his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in sexual interactions with an employee on multiple occasions during working hours, despite his relationship status and her having a committed relationship . This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources not only violated professional boundaries but led to familial breakdowns — causing a string of heartbreak that extended well beyond the workplace .
In what way can this behavior be permitted to go on? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly breached every guideline is still on the payroll at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, stems from a worrisome failure of governance within the business. Grievances have been filed , yet Collins operates without restraint .
This absence of retribution broadcasts an ominous signal : that authority and prestige within the firm can serve as a safeguard. It promotes a hostile office atmosphere , discourages team members, and ultimately undermines Ventia New Zealand the business’s ethics.